Docs/Start/Headline results
CLIENT 0.4.3PYTHON 3.8+

Headline results

Evidence that the maintenance layer reaches its floor, plus the limits of that evidence.

Live hardware: 107-channel closed-loop regulation on Rigetti Cepheus-1-108Q converged in twelve parallel 150-shot acquisitions in both runs. At the same budget, finite differences could not complete its first update.

Controlled validation: on IQM Emerald, five of five pre-registered hypotheses passed under the committed test plan.

Third-vendor validation: on IBM Heron at 156 qubits, the runtime reduced RMS error by 45.8% under a frozen budget. As the problem grew, its advantage over the tested comparison methods widened from 1.7× to 2.5×.

Independent reference implementation: the published equations held a coupled, drifting scale ladder flat from one hundred thousand to one hundred million channels, with one parallel acquisition per cycle and linear digital work. The in-class diagonal Broyden comparison also survived every rung and reached a lower floor, as committed.

Analog compute stack: a pre-registered depth-eight simulated stack with 8.4 million resident weights retained 78.6% top-1 agreement under elementwise drift, versus 65.7% free-running and 70.1% with scheduled recalibration. A 16,384-channel structured case retained 75.4%, versus 61.3% and 66.9%.

Scope: the maintenance layer and its scaling floor are demonstrated. A native-drift photonic or in-memory hardware pilot and an end-to-end workload executed across both digital and analog substrates remain undemonstrated.

Need the answer on your plant?

Run the envelope, then race the runtime and your incumbent under the same measured budget.

Start evaluation